Evidence-based diagnostic reasoning with multi-agent copilot for human pathology
Luca L. Weishaupt, Chengkuan Chen, Drew F. K. Williamson, Richard J. Chen, Guillaume Jaume, Tong Ding, Bowen Chen, Anurag Vaidya, Long Phi Le, Guillaume Jaume, Ming Y. Lu, and Faisal Mahmood

TL;DR
PathChat+ is a specialized multimodal large language model for pathology, trained on extensive data, enabling autonomous diagnostic reasoning and outperforming existing models in various benchmarks.
Contribution
The paper introduces PathChat+, a novel pathology-specific MLLM trained on large instruction datasets, and SlideSeek, a multi-agent system for autonomous, hierarchical diagnostic reasoning.
Findings
PathChat+ significantly outperforms prior models on pathology benchmarks.
SlideSeek achieves high accuracy in complex whole-slide image diagnosis.
PathChat+ can generate interpretable, visually grounded diagnostic reports.
Abstract
Pathology is experiencing rapid digital transformation driven by whole-slide imaging and artificial intelligence (AI). While deep learning-based computational pathology has achieved notable success, traditional models primarily focus on image analysis without integrating natural language instruction or rich, text-based context. Current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in computational pathology face limitations, including insufficient training data, inadequate support and evaluation for multi-image understanding, and a lack of autonomous, diagnostic reasoning capabilities. To address these limitations, we introduce PathChat+, a new MLLM specifically designed for human pathology, trained on over 1 million diverse, pathology-specific instruction samples and nearly 5.5 million question answer turns. Extensive evaluations across diverse pathology benchmarks demonstrated that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
