Reducing Self-Interaction Error in Transition-Metal Oxides with Different Exact-Exchange Fractions for Energy and Density
Harshan Reddy Gopidi, Ruiqi Zhang, Yanyong Wang, Abhirup Patra, Jianwei Sun, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, John P. Perdew, Pieremanuele Canepa

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel method, r$^2$SCANY@r$^2$SCANX, which uses different fractions of exact exchange to reduce self-interaction errors in DFT calculations for transition-metal oxides, improving accuracy over existing methods.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new approach that employs different exact exchange fractions for density and energy, enhancing predictions for strongly correlated transition-metal oxides.
Findings
r$^2$SCANY@r$^2$SCANX outperforms existing methods on 20 oxides.
It reduces prediction errors for magnetic moments and band gaps.
The method improves upon the state-of-the-art DFT+U approach.
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) in chemistry and materials science aims for "chemical accuracy," but this goal is challenged by the need to approximate the exact exchange-correlation (XC) energy functional. The rSCAN, meta-generalized gradient approximation to the XC functional fulfills 17 exact constraints of the XC energy, and has significantly boosted prediction accuracy for molecules and materials. However, rSCAN remains inadequate at predicting properties of open \textit{d} and \textit{f} transition-metal strongly correlated compounds, such as band gaps, magnetic moments, and oxidation energies. Prediction inaccuracies of rSCAN energies arise from functional and density-driven errors, mainly resulting from the DFT self-interaction error. We propose the rSCANY@rSCANX method to mitigate the self-interaction error of XC functionals for the accurate simulations of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
