TL;DR
This paper introduces a self-distillation-based method for efficiently quantifying the predictive uncertainty of Graph Neural Networks, improving trustworthiness in clinical applications without high computational costs.
Contribution
It proposes a novel self-distillation approach that captures GNN uncertainty more precisely by weighting classifiers differently, avoiding the need for multiple trained models.
Findings
Effectively captures GNN uncertainty in clinical datasets
Achieves similar performance to ensemble and MC Dropout methods
Improves uncertainty quantification for out-of-distribution detection
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown remarkable performance in the healthcare domain. However, what remained challenging is quantifying the predictive uncertainty of GNNs, which is an important aspect of trustworthiness in clinical settings. While Bayesian and ensemble methods can be used to quantify uncertainty, they are computationally expensive. Additionally, the disagreement metric used by ensemble methods to compute uncertainty cannot capture the diversity of models in an ensemble network. In this paper, we propose a novel method, based on knowledge distillation, to quantify GNNs' uncertainty more efficiently and with higher precision. We apply self-distillation, where the same network serves as both the teacher and student models, thereby avoiding the need to train several networks independently. To ensure the impact of self-distillation, we develop an uncertainty metric that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsDropout
