When Can We Reuse a Calibration Set for Multiple Conformal Predictions?
A.A. Balinsky, A.D. Balinsky

TL;DR
This paper proposes a method combining e-conformal prediction and Hoeffding's inequality to reuse a single calibration set multiple times in conformal prediction, maintaining coverage guarantees and improving practicality.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach that allows multiple uses of one calibration set in conformal prediction by applying Hoeffding's inequality, reducing the need for repeated calibration.
Findings
Successful application on CIFAR-10 dataset
Maintains coverage guarantees with high probability
Reduces calibration data requirements
Abstract
Reliable uncertainty quantification is crucial for the trustworthiness of machine learning applications. Inductive Conformal Prediction (ICP) offers a distribution-free framework for generating prediction sets or intervals with user-specified confidence. However, standard ICP guarantees are marginal and typically require a fresh calibration set for each new prediction to maintain their validity. This paper addresses this practical limitation by demonstrating how e-conformal prediction, in conjunction with Hoeffding's inequality, can enable the repeated use of a single calibration set with a high probability of preserving the desired coverage. Through a case study on the CIFAR-10 dataset, we train a deep neural network and utilise a calibration set to estimate a Hoeffding correction. This correction allows us to apply a modified Markov's inequality, leading to the construction of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
