Word-Representable Graphs and Locality of Words
Philipp B\"oll, Pamela Fleischmann, Annika Huch, Jana Krei{\ss}, Tim L\"ock, Kajus Park, Max Wiedenh\"oft

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between $k$-representable graphs and $k$-local words, establishing new bounds and properties, including hereditary characteristics, speed, and clique-width of these graph classes.
Contribution
It proves that graphs representable by $k$-local words are $(k+1)$-representable and analyzes their hereditary properties, speed, and clique-width.
Findings
Graphs representable by $k$-local words are $(k+1)$-representable.
Graphs in these classes have bounded clique-width.
These classes belong to the factorial layer in complexity.
Abstract
In this work, we investigate the relationship between -repre\-sentable graphs and graphs representable by -local words. In particular, we show that every graph representable by a -local word is -representable. A previous result about graphs represented by -local words is revisited with new insights. Moreover, we investigate both classes of graphs w.r.t. hereditary and in particular the speed as a measure. We prove that the latter ones belong to the factorial layer and that the graphs in this classes have bounded clique-width.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory
