Validating the bright Gaia celestial reference frame with new VLBI astrometry of radio stars
Jingdong Zhang, Bo Zhang, Shuangjing Xu, and Xiaofeng Mai

TL;DR
This study validates the bright Gaia celestial reference frame by comparing it with new VLBI astrometry of radio stars, estimating orientation and spin biases, and exploring magnitude-dependent biases.
Contribution
It provides an independent estimation of the Gaia-CRF3 orientation and spin biases using VLBI radio star data, highlighting potential magnitude-dependent biases.
Findings
Estimated orientation bias at G<10.5: [-15±119, +330±139,+218±109] uas
Estimated spin bias: [+21±18, +52±20,-7±20] uas/yr
Orientation bias may depend on star brightness
Abstract
There exist inconsistencies between the bright and faint Gaia Celestial Reference Frame 3 (Gaia-CRF3), which manifests as a systematic rotation and needs to be independently estimated then corrected in future data releases. We collected 64 radio stars with VLBI astrometry, of which 16 have new VLBI observations with reference epochs close to Gaia. We estimated the orientation and spin biases of the bright Gaia-CRF3 by comparing VLBI radio star astrometry with their Gaia DR3 counterparts. We also attempted to estimate orientation by utilizing the a priori magnitude-dependent spin parameters derived from Gaia internal estimation. Our independent estimation of the orientation at G<10.5 is [-15\pm119, +330\pm139,+218\pm109] uas (J2016.0), and the spin ([+21\pm18, +52\pm20,-7\pm20] uas/yr) agrees with Gaia internal estimation within 1-sigma range. The orientation-only estimation suggests…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
