Systematic Biases from ARM-Based Sensitivity and Imaging in Compton Cameras
Tomonori Ikeda, Tatsuya Sawano, Naomi Tsuji, Yoshitaka Mizumura

TL;DR
This paper reveals that using ARM-based measures in Compton camera analysis leads to overestimated sensitivity and unreliable imaging, emphasizing the importance of PSF-based methods for accurate gamma-ray astrophysics.
Contribution
It demonstrates the fundamental differences between ARM and PSF, quantifies the bias introduced by ARM-based sensitivity estimates, and highlights the need for PSF-based analysis in Compton camera imaging.
Findings
ARM resolution overestimates PSF resolution by a factor of ~4.
ARM-based background rejection overstates sensitivity in isotropic backgrounds.
Finer pixel scales than PSF resolution increase statistical uncertainties.
Abstract
The angular resolution measure (ARM) is widely used in Compton camera analyses to characterize angular uncertainty and to define event selection criteria. However, the ARM distribution is fundamentally different from the point spread function (PSF), which represents the true spatial imaging response of the system on the celestial sphere. In this study, motivated by applications in gamma-ray astrophysics, we investigated the consequences of using ARM-based definitions in sensitivity estimation and image reconstruction. Through Monte Carlo simulations of 662 keV gamma-rays, we demonstrated that the background rejection power of ARM-based region-of-interest selections with the ARM resolution of 7.0 is equivalent to that of a PSF resolution of 33. As a result, treating the ARM resolution as a surrogate for the PSF resolution leads to significant overestimation of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
