A Question Bank to Assess AI Inclusivity: Mapping out the Journey from Diversity Errors to Inclusion Excellence
Rifat Ara Shams, Didar Zowghi, Muneera Bano

TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive question bank with 253 items to evaluate AI systems' inclusivity across multiple pillars, aiming to improve diversity and fairness in AI development and deployment.
Contribution
It introduces a structured, multi-source developed question bank for assessing AI inclusivity, filling a gap in existing risk assessment frameworks.
Findings
The question bank effectively evaluates AI inclusivity across diverse roles and domains.
Integrating D&I principles into AI workflows enhances fairness and responsibility.
Simulated user study validates the relevance and utility of the question bank.
Abstract
Ensuring diversity and inclusion (D&I) in artificial intelligence (AI) is crucial for mitigating biases and promoting equitable decision-making. However, existing AI risk assessment frameworks often overlook inclusivity, lacking standardized tools to measure an AI system's alignment with D&I principles. This paper introduces a structured AI inclusivity question bank, a comprehensive set of 253 questions designed to evaluate AI inclusivity across five pillars: Humans, Data, Process, System, and Governance. The development of the question bank involved an iterative, multi-source approach, incorporating insights from literature reviews, D&I guidelines, Responsible AI frameworks, and a simulated user study. The simulated evaluation, conducted with 70 AI-generated personas related to different AI jobs, assessed the question bank's relevance and effectiveness for AI inclusivity across diverse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
