TL;DR
This paper introduces SpuriVerse, a benchmark for evaluating large vision-language models' ability to generalize beyond spurious correlations, revealing that models often rely on shortcuts but can improve with diverse training.
Contribution
We created SpuriVerse, a comprehensive benchmark with real and synthetic spurious correlations, and evaluated models showing how training on diverse patterns enhances generalization.
Findings
State-of-the-art models achieve only 37.1% accuracy on SpuriVerse.
Fine-tuning on synthetic spurious examples boosts accuracy to 78.4%.
Models can learn to avoid shortcuts and focus on overall image context.
Abstract
Finetuning can cause spurious correlations to arise between non-essential features and the target labels, but benchmarks to study these effects involve contrived settings and narrow tasks. In contrast, we consider spurious correlations in multi-modal Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) pretrained on extensive and diverse datasets without explicit task supervision. We develop a benchmark by sourcing GPT-4o errors on real-world visual-question-answering (VQA) benchmarks, then curating a subset through LVLM-human annotation and synthetic counterfactual evaluation to identify errors caused by spurious correlations. This process yields SpuriVerse, a novel benchmark comprised of 124 distinct types of spurious correlations extracted from real-world datasets, each containing 1 realistic and 10 synthetic VQA samples for a total of 1364 multiple choice questions. We evaluate 15 open and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
