SoK: Current State of Ethereum's Enshrined Proposer Builder Separation
Maxwell Koegler

TL;DR
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of Ethereum's Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS), analyzing its current implementations, the case for enshrinement, potential upgrades, and socioeconomic impacts within the blockchain ecosystem.
Contribution
It systematically reviews existing PBS mechanisms, discusses the need for protocol enshrinement, and explores potential upgrades and on-chain socioeconomic implications.
Findings
Current PBS mechanisms vary in implementation.
Enshrinement could mitigate MEV-related issues.
Potential upgrades aim to enhance censorship resistance and fairness.
Abstract
Initially introduced to Ethereum via Flashbots' MEV-boost, Proposer-Builder Separation allows proposers to auction off blockspace to a market of transaction orderers, known as builders. PBS is currently available to validators through the aforementioned MEV-boost, but its unregulated and relay-dependent nature has much of the Ethereum community calling for its enshrinement. Providing a protocol-integrated PBS marketspace and communication channel for payload outsourcing is termed PBS enshrinement. Although ePBS potentially introduces native MEV mitigation mechanisms and reduces validator operation costs, fears of multiparty collusion and chain stagnation are all too real. In addition to mitigating these potential drawbacks, PBS research pursues many tenets revered by Web3 enthusiasts, including but not limited to, censorship resistance, validator reward equity, and deflationary finance.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
