DExNet: Combining Observations of Domain Adapted Critics for Leaf Disease Classification with Limited Data

TL;DR

DExNet is a few-shot learning framework that combines features from multiple domain-adapted critics to improve leaf disease classification accuracy with limited data, reducing data requirements significantly.

Contribution

The paper introduces DExNet, a novel few-shot learning approach that leverages multiple pre-trained CNN critics and feature fusion for plant disease classification with scarce data.

Findings

Achieved up to 94.07% accuracy with 15-shot classification.

Reduced training data requirement by 94.5%.

Outperformed existing methods in various scenarios.

Abstract

While deep learning-based architectures have been widely used for correctly detecting and classifying plant diseases, they require large-scale datasets to learn generalized features and achieve state-of-the-art performance. This poses a challenge for such models to obtain satisfactory performance in classifying leaf diseases with limited samples. This work proposes a few-shot learning framework, Domain-adapted Expert Network (DExNet), for plant disease classification that compensates for the lack of sufficient training data by combining observations of a number of expert critics. It starts with extracting the feature embeddings as 'observations' from nine 'critics' that are state-of-the-art pre-trained CNN-based architectures. These critics are 'domain adapted' using a publicly available leaf disease dataset having no overlapping classes with the specific downstream task of interest. The observations are then passed to the 'Feature Fusion Block' and finally to a classifier network consisting of Bi-LSTM layers. The proposed pipeline is evaluated on the 10 classes of tomato leaf images from the PlantVillage dataset, achieving promising accuracies of 89.06%, 92.46%, and 94.07%, respectively, for 5-shot, 10-shot, and 15-shot classification. Furthermore, an accuracy of 98.09+-0.7% has been achieved in 80-shot classification, which is only 1.2% less than state-of-the-art, allowing a 94.5% reduction in the training data requirement. The proposed pipeline also outperforms existing works on leaf disease classification with limited data in both laboratory and real-life conditions in single-domain, mixed-domain, and cross-domain scenarios.