Dilution of Entanglement: Unveiling Quantum State Discrimination Advantages
Atanu Bhunia, Priyabrata Char, Subrata Bera, Indranil Biswas, Indrani Chattopadhyay, Debasis Sarkar

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different entanglement levels in three-qubit GHZ states affect quantum state discrimination, revealing that maximal entanglement is generally needed for perfect discrimination, and proposing a method to explore this with non-maximally entangled states.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to analyze perfect distinguishability of orthogonal product states using non-maximally entangled GHZ states, linking entanglement structure to discrimination capabilities.
Findings
Maximally entangled states enable perfect discrimination.
Generic GHZ states offer advantages in probabilistic distinguishability.
Open problem: achieving perfect discrimination with non-maximally entangled states.
Abstract
The states in the three-qubit GHZ SLOCC class can exhibit diverse entanglement patterns, as they may have no entanglement in any reduced subsystems, or show entanglement across one, two, or all three bipartite cuts. Significant research has explored how such states can be used in entanglement-assisted discrimination tasks. In this paper, we analyze the relationship between probability of error and amount of bipartite and multiparty entanglement, examining how different levels of entanglement impact the accuracy of state discrimination. Also we have shown that the generic class of GHZ state provide some advantages in probabilistic distinguishibility. However, perfect discrimination typically requires maximally entangled states. The use of non-maximally entangled states as a resource for perfect discrimination remains an open problem in this area of research. In this manuscript, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
