Beyond utility: incorporating eye-tracking, skin conductance and heart rate data into cognitive and econometric travel behaviour models
Thomas O. Hancock, Stephane Hess, Charisma F. Choudhury

TL;DR
This paper explores integrating physiological data like eye-tracking, skin conductance, and heart rate into cognitive and econometric travel behaviour models, enhancing their ability to predict decision-making processes.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to incorporate physiological data into both econometric and decision field theory models for travel choices, addressing a significant research gap.
Findings
Physiological data improves static choice model accuracy.
Stress and eye-tracking data enhance dynamic decision models.
Decision field theory benefits more from physiological data than traditional models.
Abstract
Choice models for large-scale applications have historically relied on economic theories (e.g. utility maximisation) that establish relationships between the choices of individuals, their characteristics, and the attributes of the alternatives. In a parallel stream, choice models in cognitive psychology have focused on modelling the decision-making process, but typically in controlled scenarios. Recent research developments have attempted to bridge the modelling paradigms, with choice models that are based on psychological foundations, such as decision field theory (DFT), outperforming traditional econometric choice models for travel mode and route choice behaviour. The use of physiological data, which can provide indications about the choice-making process and mental states, opens up the opportunity to further advance the models. In particular, the use of such data to enrich 'process'…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
