Weighted Assumption Based Argumentation to reason about ethical principles and actions
Paolo Baldi, Fabio Aurelio D'Asaro, Abeer Dyoub, Francesca Alessandra Lisi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a weighted assumption-based argumentation framework to enhance ethical reasoning, assigning weights to arguments and attacks, with an implementation using Answer Set Programming.
Contribution
It extends ABA with weights for arguments and attacks, providing a novel approach to ethical reasoning and demonstrating its practical implementation.
Findings
Effective modeling of ethical principles through weighted arguments
Implementation using Answer Set Programming shows practical viability
Enhanced reasoning capabilities in ethical decision-making
Abstract
We augment Assumption Based Argumentation (ABA for short) with weighted argumentation. In a nutshell, we assign weights to arguments and then derive the weight of attacks between ABA arguments. We illustrate our proposal through running examples in the field of ethical reasoning, and present an implementation based on Answer Set Programming.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
