Distinguishing scale-dependent Planck stars from renormalization group improved Schwarzschild black holes by Gravitational waves
Li Huang

TL;DR
This paper investigates how gravitational wave signals from extreme mass-ratio inspirals can distinguish between different models of black holes, specifically scale-dependent Planck stars and renormalization group improved Schwarzschild black holes, using theoretical analysis and waveform modeling.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of gravitational waveforms from two quantum-corrected black hole models using both time- and frequency-domain methods, including new orbital evolution approaches.
Findings
Waveform differences are detectable with future gravitational wave detectors.
Orbital evolution methods show consistent results across different eccentricities.
Sensitivity curves can test the nature of quantum-corrected black holes.
Abstract
Extreme mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs), consisting of a stellar-mass black hole orbiting a supermassive black hole, are among the primary targets for future space-based gravitational wave detectors. By analyzing the emitted gravitational wave signals, we can probe the nature of compact objects in the strong-field region. To achieve this, we examine the effects of gravitational radiation. In this work, we base our calculations on the general relativistic Schwarzschild background and calculate the energy and angular momentum fluxes of gravitational waves. We perform a theoretical analysis of the equations of motion and the orbital evolution equations for EMRIs. The gravitational waveforms generated by the different periodic orbits of timelike test particles around scale-dependent Planck stars or renormalization group improved Schwarzschild black holes are investigated using both time-domain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
