TL;DR
This paper introduces SELFI, a novel deepfake detection framework that adaptively leverages face identity features to improve generalization across different manipulation methods.
Contribution
We propose SELFI, which explicitly models and dynamically controls identity features for more robust deepfake detection across diverse datasets.
Findings
SELFI outperforms prior methods by 3.1% AUC on average across four benchmarks.
On DFDC, SELFI exceeds previous best by 6%.
Explicit identity modeling enhances cross-manipulation generalization.
Abstract
Face identity provides a powerful signal for deepfake detection. Prior studies show that even when not explicitly modeled, classifiers often learn identity features implicitly. This has led to conflicting views: some suppress identity cues to reduce bias, while others rely on them as forensic evidence. To reconcile these views, we analyze two hypotheses: (1) whether face identity alone is discriminative for detecting deepfakes, and (2) whether such identity features generalize poorly across manipulation methods. Our experiments confirm that identity is informative but context-dependent. While some manipulations preserve identity-consistent artifacts, others distort identity cues and harm generalization. We argue that identity features should neither be blindly suppressed nor relied upon, but instead be explicitly modeled and adaptively controlled based on per-sample relevance. We…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
The SELFI design (FAIA + IAFM) is simple yet effective, obtaining improvement with multiple backbones. Extensive experiments across FF++, Celeb-DF v2, DFD, DFDC, and DFDCP show consistent cross-dataset gains
Will the identity information limit the model's generalization ability, especially for open-world tasks involving individuals with random identities? Additionally, could the identity feature be affected by age or makeup? The description of Figure 1 is confusing. What characteristics do the up and down arrows in different colors represent? How are they related to identifying helpful or harmful identity information? As shown in Table 1, the improvements brought by the proposed method are relativ
1. The proposed method is clearly presented with understandable figures and explanations. 2. The motivation is relatively novel. Although facial identity information has been used in previous works, its different effects on various forgery types are still not well explored. This paper attempts to study this issue. 3. The method is simple and direct. The design is reasonable under the given motivation and easy to follow.
1. Lack of analysis and comparison with similar methods, e.g., those that use implicit identity information [1] or explicit usage of identity [2]. 2. Inappropriate experimental setup. In Table 4, the comparison among different auxiliary features does not show a clear advantage of the proposed method. Moreover, the authors did not conduct ablation studies specifically on the use of face identity features. For example, they could study how different face recognition models affect SELFI or tes
- This work highlights an interesting yet often-overlooked question in deepfake detection — how facial identity cues influence detection performance across different manipulation types — and provides a systematic empirical analysis to investigate this effect. - The manuscript is well-structured and easy to follow, and the authors release the core code for reproduction.
**1. Limited conceptual novelty.** While this work identifies an interesting research question regarding the impact of facial identity cues in deepfake detection, the overall novelty of the solutions to this question is moderate. The idea of integrating facial identity embeddings from a frozen face recognizer into a detection model is conceptually similar to prior works, such as RepDFD[1]. **2. Performances not leading among SOTA.** _a)_ Although SELFI achieves consistent improvements across s
1. The motivation of this paper is valuable and significant. There indeed exist two major perspectives in the current research community—one emphasizing the usefulness of identity information and the other questioning its necessity. Therefore, investigating this issue in depth and proposing further solutions is a meaningful and timely contribution. 2. The proposed FAIA and IAFM modules are well-designed and demonstrate thoughtful architectural considerations. 3. The paper makes an effort to prov
1. Limited validation on outdated deepfake methods. The validation experiments should be conducted on more advanced deepfake generation techniques. This point is crucial, as the current experiments rely solely on the FaceForensics++ (FF++) dataset, which contains relatively outdated and simplistic methods from around 2019. The identity consistency in those earlier face-swapping approaches is inherently limited. This introduces a significant logical gap in the validation: it is possible that the
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsAdapter
