Particle dynamics and optical appearance of charged spherically symmetric black holes in bumblebee gravity
Mou Xu, Jianbo Lu, Ruonan Li, Yu Liu, Shu-Min Wu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effects of Lorentz-violation and charge parameters on the particle dynamics, shadow, and optical appearance of charged black holes in bumblebee gravity, providing observational constraints and distinguishing features.
Contribution
It offers a detailed analysis of black hole shadows and optical properties in bumblebee gravity, including observational constraints and comparison with other black hole models.
Findings
Effective potential peaks are affected oppositely by Lorentz-violation and charge.
Shadow and photon sphere radii decrease with increasing parameters, smaller than in standard black holes.
Parameter constraints are derived from Event Horizon Telescope data.
Abstract
In this paper, we study the particle dynamics, shadow, and optical appearance of charged black holes (BHs) in bumblebee gravity. Firstly, we find that the Lorentz-violation parameter l and charge parameter Q have opposite effects on the peak of the effective potential by analyzing timelike geodesics, and the radius of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) decreases as the BH parameters l and Q increase. We also explore the behaviors of particle energy, angular momentum, and Keplerian frequency. Secondly, for null geodesics, both the photon sphere radius and the shadow radius decrease with increasing l and Q, and are consistently smaller than those of the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole (RNBH) and Schwarzschild-like BH. And based on observational data reported by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration, we constrain the parameters l and Q by using the shadow radius data of Sgr…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
