The JWST/AURORA Survey: Multiple Balmer and Paschen Emission Lines for Individual Star-forming Galaxies at z=1.5-4.4. I. A Diversity of Nebular Attenuation Curves and Evidence for Non-Unity Dust Covering Fractions
Naveen A. Reddy, Alice E. Shapley, Ryan L. Sanders, Michael W. Topping, Richard S. Ellis, Max Pettini, Gabriel Brammer, Fergus Cullen, Natascha M. Forster Schreiber, Ali A. Khostovan, Derek J. McLeod, Ross J. McLure, Desika Narayanan, Pascal A. Oesch, Anthony J. Pahl

TL;DR
This study uses JWST/AURORA data to analyze nebular attenuation and dust covering fractions in high-redshift star-forming galaxies, revealing diverse attenuation curves and evidence for partial dust coverage affecting star formation and radiation escape.
Contribution
It introduces a model with subunity dust covering fractions to explain the diversity of nebular attenuation curves in high-redshift galaxies.
Findings
Nebular reddening from Paschen lines exceeds that from Balmer lines in half the sample.
Nebular attenuation curves show a broad range of normalization values (Rv ~ 3.2-16.4).
A model with dust covering fraction fcov ~ 0.6-1.0 explains the observed attenuation diversity.
Abstract
We present the nebular attenuation curves and dust covering fractions for 24 redshift z=1.5-4.4 star-forming galaxies using multiple Balmer and Paschen lines from the JWST/AURORA survey. Nebular reddening derived from Paschen lines exceeds that from Balmer lines for at least half the galaxies in the sample when assuming the commonly-adopted Galactic extinction curve, implying the presence of heavily reddened star formation. The nebular attenuation curves exhibit a broad range of normalizations (Rv ~ 3.2-16.4). Motivated by the offsets in reddening deduced from the Balmer and Paschen lines, and the high Rv values for the individual nebular attenuation curves, both of which suggest variations in the dust-stars geometry, we propose a model with a subunity dust covering fraction (fcov). Fitting such a model to the HI recombination line ratios indicates fcov ~ 0.6-1.0. The normalizations of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
