The AURORA Survey: Tracing Galactic Outflows at $z\gtrsim2.5$ with JWST/NIRSpec NUV Absorption Lines
Emily Kehoe, Alice E. Shapley, Ryan L. Sanders, Naveen A. Reddy, Natalie Lam, Leonardo Clarke, Fergus Cullen, Richard S. Ellis, N. M. Forster Schreiber, Tucker Jones, Ali Ahmad Khostovan, Derek J. McLeod, Ross J. McLure, Desika Narayanan, Pascal Oesch, and Anthony J. Pahl

TL;DR
This study uses JWST/NIRSpec to analyze galactic outflows at high redshift, revealing how outflow properties correlate with galaxy characteristics and comparing different ISM tracers across cosmic time.
Contribution
First direct comparison of outflow properties from early universe to present day using near-UV absorption lines in JWST data.
Findings
Outflows are more common in higher mass and dustier galaxies.
Maximum outflow velocities increase with stellar mass, SFR, and dust attenuation.
Mg II emission is prevalent in lower mass, less dusty, high sSFR galaxies.
Abstract
We probe galactic-scale outflows in star-forming galaxies at drawn from the \textit{JWST}/NIRSpec AURORA program. For the first time, we directly compare outflow properties from the early universe to the present day using near-UV absorption lines. We measure ISM kinematics from Fe\,{\sc ii} and Mg\,{\sc ii} absorption features in 41 and 43 galaxies, respectively, and examine how these kinematics correlate with galaxy properties. We find that galaxies with outflows tend to have higher stellar masses, and that maximum outflow velocities increase with stellar mass, SFR, UV slope , , and . We also find that Mg\,{\sc ii} emission is more common in galaxies with lower masses, higher sSFRs, and less dust. These trends are consistent with those in star-forming galaxies at when using the same outflow tracers, suggesting that the feedback from star…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
