Comparison between External and Internal Single Stage Planetary gearbox actuators for legged robots
Aman Singh, Deepak Kapa, Prasham Chedda, Shishir N.Y. Kolathaya

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares internal and external single-stage planetary gearboxes for legged robot actuators, providing a design framework and demonstrating the optimal choice depends on gear ratio, with experimental validation.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic design framework for selecting planetary gearbox architectures based on performance needs and validates it through optimized actuator prototypes.
Findings
ISSPG is lighter at gear ratios 5:1 to 7:1.
ESSPG becomes preferable above 7:1 gear ratio.
Optimized prototypes match predicted masses closely.
Abstract
Legged robots, such as quadrupeds and humanoids, require high-performance actuators for efficient locomotion. Quasi-Direct-Drive (QDD) actuators with single-stage planetary gearboxes offer low inertia, high efficiency, and transparency. Among planetary gearbox architectures, Internal (ISSPG) and External Single-Stage Planetary Gearbox (ESSPG) are the two predominant designs. While ISSPG is often preferred for its compactness and high torque density at certain gear ratios, no objective comparison between the two architectures exists. Additionally, existing designs rely on heuristics rather than systematic optimization. This paper presents a design framework for optimally selecting actuator parameters based on given performance requirements and motor specifications. Using this framework, we generate and analyze various optimized gearbox designs for both architectures. Our results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobotic Locomotion and Control · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
