Impact of Detector Calibration Accuracy on Black Hole Spectroscopy
Mallika R. Sinha, Ling Sun, Sizheng Ma

TL;DR
This paper assesses how detector calibration errors influence black hole spectroscopy using gravitational wave data, establishing benchmarks for calibration accuracy needed in future observatories to avoid biased results.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of calibration error impacts on black hole ringdown measurements, setting new standards for calibration precision in future gravitational wave detectors.
Findings
Current calibration standards are sufficient for existing observations.
Calibration errors must be below 4% in magnitude and 4° in phase for high SNR events.
Results offer benchmarks for calibration accuracy in next-generation detectors.
Abstract
Systematic errors in detector calibration can bias signal analyses and potentially lead to incorrect interpretations suggesting violations of general relativity. In this study, we investigate how calibration systematics affect black hole (BH) spectroscopy, a technique that uses the quasinormal modes (QNMs) emitted during the ringdown phase of gravitational waves (GWs) to study remnant BHs formed in compact binary coalescences. We simulate a series of physically motivated, tunable calibration errors and use them to intentionally miscalibrate numerical relativity waveforms. We then apply a QNM extraction method -- the rational QNM filter -- to quantify the impact of these calibration errors. We find that current calibration standards (errors within in magnitude and in phase across the most sensitive frequency range of 20--2000 Hz) are adequate for BH ringdown analyses…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
