Pediatric Pancreas Segmentation from MRI Scans with Deep Learning
Elif Keles, Merve Yazol, Gorkem Durak, Ziliang Hong, Halil Ertugrul Aktas, Zheyuan Zhang, Linkai Peng, Onkar Susladkar, Necati Guzelyel, Oznur Leman Boyunaga, Cemal Yazici, Mark Lowe, Aliye Uc, Ulas Bagci

TL;DR
This study validates PanSegNet, a deep learning algorithm for pediatric pancreas segmentation on MRI scans, demonstrating high accuracy and reliability across healthy and diseased children, thus advancing non-invasive pancreatic imaging.
Contribution
Introduces and validates PanSegNet, the first deep learning tool for pediatric pancreatic MRI segmentation, with publicly available dataset and code.
Findings
Achieved DSC scores of 88% in controls and over 80% in diseased cases.
Demonstrated strong agreement with manual segmentation (kappa > 0.8).
Provided a reliable, automated segmentation method for clinical and research use.
Abstract
Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate and validate PanSegNet, a deep learning (DL) algorithm for pediatric pancreas segmentation on MRI in children with acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and healthy controls. Methods: With IRB approval, we retrospectively collected 84 MRI scans (1.5T/3T Siemens Aera/Verio) from children aged 2-19 years at Gazi University (2015-2024). The dataset includes healthy children as well as patients diagnosed with AP or CP based on clinical criteria. Pediatric and general radiologists manually segmented the pancreas, then confirmed by a senior pediatric radiologist. PanSegNet-generated segmentations were assessed using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Cohen's kappa measured observer agreement. Results: Pancreas MRI T2W scans were obtained from 42 children with AP/CP (mean age: 11.73 +/- 3.9…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
