The isotropy of Hubble expansion in the early and late Universe
Alan Junzhe Zhou, Scott Dodelson, and Daniel Scolnic

TL;DR
This study tests the isotropy of the universe's expansion across different epochs using multiple cosmological probes, finding no significant anisotropy and setting tight upper limits on possible directional variations.
Contribution
It constructs comprehensive full-sky maps of expansion rate variations combining supernovae, galaxy data, and CMB, providing the first such combined analysis with stringent anisotropy constraints.
Findings
No detected anisotropy in Hubble expansion across probes
Upper limits on anisotropy are below 1% at 99% confidence
An anomaly in fundamental plane residuals likely due to dataset systematics
Abstract
We test the isotropy of Hubble expansion by combining several probes for the first time, constructing full-sky maps of expansion rate variation using Type Ia supernovae, fundamental plane galaxies, and CMB temperature fluctuations. We find no hint of anisotropy or correlation between early- and late-Universe expansion across all systematic models. The 99% confidence upper limits on expansion rate anisotropy are 0.39% for low-redshift supernovae, 0.95% for high-redshift CMB, and 0.37% when combined at a 60-degree smoothing scale. A significant anomaly in the fundamental plane residual map may reflect systematics in the current DESI dataset, as evidenced by the absence of cross-correlation with other tracers and its correlation with spatial density variations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
