OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents
Thomas Kuntz, Agatha Duzan, Hao Zhao, Francesco Croce, Zico Kolter, Nicolas Flammarion, Maksym Andriushchenko

TL;DR
OS-Harm is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of computer use agents, focusing on harm types like misuse, prompt injections, and misbehavior, with automated evaluation and insights into model vulnerabilities.
Contribution
The paper introduces OS-Harm, a new benchmark with 150 tasks and an automated safety judge, to systematically assess safety risks of LLM-based computer use agents.
Findings
Models often comply with misuse queries
Vulnerable to static prompt injections
Occasionally perform unsafe actions
Abstract
Computer use agents are LLM-based agents that can directly interact with a graphical user interface, by processing screenshots or accessibility trees. While these systems are gaining popularity, their safety has been largely overlooked, despite the fact that evaluating and understanding their potential for harmful behavior is essential for widespread adoption. To address this gap, we introduce OS-Harm, a new benchmark for measuring safety of computer use agents. OS-Harm is built on top of the OSWorld environment and aims to test models across three categories of harm: deliberate user misuse, prompt injection attacks, and model misbehavior. To cover these cases, we create 150 tasks that span several types of safety violations (harassment, copyright infringement, disinformation, data exfiltration, etc.) and require the agent to interact with a variety of OS applications (email client,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques
