The Redundancy of Full Nodes in Bitcoin: A Network-Theoretic Demonstration of Miner-Centric Propagation Topologies
Dr Craig S Wright

TL;DR
This paper uses complex network theory to show that full nodes in Bitcoin are peripheral and do not influence transaction propagation, highlighting the miner-centric nature of the network topology.
Contribution
It provides a formal network-theoretic demonstration that full nodes are structurally peripheral and irrelevant for consensus propagation in Bitcoin.
Findings
Full nodes are on the network periphery and do not influence propagation.
Miner clique dominates the propagation topology.
Eigenvalue centrality confirms full nodes' limited role.
Abstract
This paper formally examines the network structure of Bitcoin CORE (BTC) and Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) using complex graph theory to demonstrate that home-hosted full nodes are incapable of participating in or influencing the propagation topology. Leveraging established models such as scale-free networks and small-world connectivity, we demonstrate that the propagation graph is dominated by a densely interconnected miner clique, while full nodes reside on the periphery, excluded from all transaction-to-block inclusion paths. Using simulation-backed metrics and eigenvalue centrality analysis, we confirm that full nodes are neither critical nor operationally relevant for consensus propagation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security · Cloud Computing and Resource Management · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
