Machine Mirages: Defining the Undefined
Hamidou Tembine

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of machine mirages, a new class of errors in multimodal AI systems, emphasizing the need for explicit definitions and systematic assessment to improve reliability and ethical integration.
Contribution
It defines various types of machine mirages, highlighting their significance and proposing systematic evaluation methods for these errors in multimodal AI systems.
Findings
Identification of diverse machine mirages in AI systems
Highlighting the importance of systematic error assessment
Implications for AI reliability and ethics
Abstract
As multimodal machine intelligence systems started achieving average animal-level and average human-level fluency in many measurable tasks in processing images, language, and sound, they began to exhibit a new class of cognitive aberrations: machine mirages. These include delusion, illusion, confabulation, hallucination, misattribution error, semantic drift, semantic compression, exaggeration, causal inference failure, uncanny valley of perception, bluffing-patter-bullshitting, cognitive stereotypy, pragmatic misunderstanding, hypersignification, semantic reheating-warming, simulated authority effect, fallacious abductive leap, contextual drift, referential hallucination, semiotic Frankenstein effect, calibration failure, spurious correlation, bias amplification, concept drift sensitivity, misclassification under uncertainty, adversarial vulnerability, overfitting, prosodic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParanormal Experiences and Beliefs · Sound Studies and Aurality · Cognitive Science and Education Research
MethodsCausal inference
