Matching logic -- a new axiomatization
Lauren\c{t}iu Leu\c{s}tean, Dafina Trufa\c{s}

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simplified axiomatization and proof system for first-order matching logic, inspired by classical logic axiomatizations, eliminating the need for free variables and substitution notions.
Contribution
It presents a new, simpler proof system for matching logic, adapting classical axiomatizations to improve clarity and foundational understanding.
Findings
A new proof system for matching logic is proposed.
The proof system simplifies existing frameworks by removing free variable notions.
Applications to first-order matching logic with definedness are demonstrated.
Abstract
In these notes we propose a new, simpler proof system for first-order matching logic with application and definedness. The new proof system is inspired by Tarski's axiomatization for first order-logic with equality (simplified by Kalish and Montague), that does not involve the notions of a free variable and free substitution. We give also a proof system for first-order matching logic with application, obtained by adapting to matching logic G\"{o}del's proof system for first-order intuitionistic logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems · Semantic Web and Ontologies
