Enforcing tail calibration when training probabilistic forecast models
Jakob Benjamin Wessel, Maybritt Schillinger, Frank Kwasniok, Sam Allen

TL;DR
This paper explores how modifying loss functions during training can enhance the calibration of probabilistic forecasts for extreme events, focusing on wind speed predictions.
Contribution
It introduces tailored loss functions based on weighted scoring rules and tail miscalibration measures to improve extreme event forecast calibration.
Findings
State-of-the-art models lack calibration for extreme wind speeds.
Loss function adaptations improve tail calibration.
Trade-off exists between extreme event and general forecast calibration.
Abstract
Probabilistic forecasts are typically obtained using state-of-the-art statistical and machine learning models, with model parameters estimated by optimizing a proper scoring rule over a set of training data. If the model class is not correctly specified, then the learned model will not necessarily issue forecasts that are calibrated. Calibrated forecasts allow users to appropriately balance risks in decision making, and it is particularly important that forecast models issue calibrated predictions for extreme events, since such outcomes often generate large socio-economic impacts. In this work, we study how the loss function used to train probabilistic forecast models can be adapted to improve the reliability of forecasts made for extreme events. We investigate loss functions based on weighted scoring rules, and additionally propose regularizing loss functions using a measure of tail…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
