Machine Learning-Driven Compensation for Non-Ideal Channels in AWG-Based FBG Interrogator
Ivan A. Kazakov, Iana V. Kulichenko, Egor E. Kovalev, Angelina A. Treskova, Daria D. Barma, Kirill M. Malakhov, Ivan V. Oseledets, Arkady V. Shipulin

TL;DR
This study compares analytical and machine learning calibration methods for fiber Bragg grating interrogators based on AWG, demonstrating that ML offers superior accuracy, generalization, and reduced manual effort in handling non-ideal spectral responses.
Contribution
The paper introduces a machine learning calibration approach for AWG-based FBG interrogators, outperforming traditional analytical methods in accuracy and scalability.
Findings
ML calibration achieves 3.17 pm RMSE, better than 7.11 pm of analytical method.
ML model generalizes across a 2.9 nm span with sub-5 pm accuracy.
ML reduces manual calibration and enhances robustness for diverse sensors.
Abstract
We present an experimental study of a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) interrogator based on a silicon oxynitride (SiON) photonic integrated arrayed waveguide grating (AWG). While AWG-based interrogators are compact and scalable, their practical performance is limited by non-ideal spectral responses. To address this, two calibration strategies within a 2.4 nm spectral region were compared: (1) a segmented analytical model based on a sigmoid fitting function, and (2) a machine learning (ML)-based regression model. The analytical method achieves a root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.11 pm within the calibrated range, while the ML approach based on exponential regression achieves 3.17 pm. Moreover, the ML model demonstrates generalization across an extended 2.9 nm wavelength span, maintaining sub-5 pm accuracy without re-fitting. Residual and error distribution analyses further illustrate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
