From Promise to Peril: Rethinking Cybersecurity Red and Blue Teaming in the Age of LLMs
Alsharif Abuadbba, Chris Hicks, Kristen Moore, Vasilios Mavroudis, Burak Hasircioglu, Diksha Goel, Piers Jennings

TL;DR
This paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming cybersecurity red and blue team operations, highlighting their potential, limitations, and risks in real-world applications.
Contribution
It provides a structured analysis of LLM applications within cybersecurity frameworks, identifying key limitations and proposing safety and reliability recommendations.
Findings
LLMs can assist in attack planning and threat analysis.
LLMs exhibit fragility and hallucinations in high-stakes environments.
Risks include adversarial misuse and reduced human oversight.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are set to reshape cybersecurity by augmenting red and blue team operations. Red teams can exploit LLMs to plan attacks, craft phishing content, simulate adversaries, and generate exploit code. Conversely, blue teams may deploy them for threat intelligence synthesis, root cause analysis, and streamlined documentation. This dual capability introduces both transformative potential and serious risks. This position paper maps LLM applications across cybersecurity frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), offering a structured view of their current utility and limitations. While LLMs demonstrate fluency and versatility across various tasks, they remain fragile in high-stakes, context-heavy environments. Key limitations include hallucinations, limited context retention, poor reasoning, and sensitivity to prompts, which undermine…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
