Using LLMs for Security Advisory Investigations: How Far Are We?
Bayu Fedra Abdullah, Yusuf Sulistyo Nugroho, Brittany Reid, Raula Gaikovina Kula, Kazumasa Shimari, Kenichi Matsumoto

TL;DR
This paper evaluates ChatGPT's ability to generate, verify, and extract CVE-IDs in security advisories, revealing high plausibility but limited reliability in authenticating security information.
Contribution
It provides an empirical assessment of ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations in cybersecurity advisory tasks, highlighting areas for improvement.
Findings
ChatGPT generated plausible advisories for 96% of real CVE-IDs.
It correctly identified fake CVE-IDs with 97% accuracy.
The model produced a fake CVE-ID in 6% of cases when re-evaluating advisories.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in software security, but their trustworthiness in generating accurate vulnerability advisories remains uncertain. This study investigates the ability of ChatGPT to (1) generate plausible security advisories from CVE-IDs, (2) differentiate real from fake CVE-IDs, and (3) extract CVE-IDs from advisory descriptions. Using a curated dataset of 100 real and 100 fake CVE-IDs, we manually analyzed the credibility and consistency of the model's outputs. The results show that ChatGPT generated plausible security advisories for 96% of given input real CVE-IDs and 97% of given input fake CVE-IDs, demonstrating a limitation in differentiating between real and fake IDs. Furthermore, when these generated advisories were reintroduced to ChatGPT to identify their original CVE-ID, the model produced a fake CVE-ID in 6% of cases from real advisories.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
