Fortified Proximal Causal Inference with Many Invalid Proxies
Myeonghun Yu, Xu Shi, Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a semiparametric method for causal inference that remains valid even when many proxies used for confounding adjustment are potentially invalid, by leveraging a new class of fortified confounding bridge functions.
Contribution
It develops a novel fortified confounding bridge function framework and provides estimators that are robust to invalid proxies without knowing which proxies are valid.
Findings
Method achieves nonparametric identification of ATE with invalid proxies.
Estimators are multiply robust and locally efficient.
Simulation and real data demonstrate effectiveness.
Abstract
Causal inference from observational data often relies on the assumption of no unmeasured confounding, an assumption frequently violated in practice due to unobserved or poorly measured covariates. Proximal causal inference (PCI) offers a promising framework for addressing unmeasured confounding using a pair of outcome and treatment confounding proxies. However, existing PCI methods typically assume all specified proxies are valid, which may be unrealistic and is untestable without extra assumptions. In this paper, we develop a semiparametric approach for a many-proxy PCI setting that accommodates potentially invalid treatment confounding proxies. We introduce a new class of fortified confounding bridge functions and establish nonparametric identification of the population average treatment effect (ATE) under the assumption that at least out of candidate treatment…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Philosophy and History of Science
