Artificial Intelligence and Civil Discourse: How LLMs Moderate Climate Change Conversations
Wenlu Fan, Wentao Xu

TL;DR
This study investigates how large language models naturally moderate climate change conversations by maintaining emotional neutrality and lower emotional intensity, potentially fostering more civil and constructive public discourse.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of LLMs and humans in social media discussions, revealing inherent moderating behaviors of LLMs in contentious topics.
Findings
LLMs exhibit emotional neutrality unlike humans.
LLMs maintain lower emotional intensity in conversations.
LLMs can potentially improve discourse civility.
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into online platforms and digital communication spaces, their potential to influence public discourse - particularly in contentious areas like climate change - requires systematic investigation. This study examines how LLMs naturally moderate climate change conversations through their distinct communicative behaviors. We conduct a comparative analysis of conversations between LLMs and human users on social media platforms, using five advanced models: three open-source LLMs (Gemma, Llama 3, and Llama 3.3) and two commercial systems (GPT-4o by OpenAI and Claude 3.5 by Anthropic). Through sentiment analysis, we assess the emotional characteristics of responses from both LLMs and humans. The results reveal two key mechanisms through which LLMs moderate discourse: first, LLMs consistently display emotional neutrality, showing far…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
MethodsLLaMA
