ImmunoFOMO: Are Language Models missing what oncologists see?
Aman Sinha, Bogdan-Valentin Popescu, Xavier Coubez, Marianne Clausel, Mathieu Constant

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the ability of various language models to identify specific immunotherapy concepts in breast cancer literature, comparing their performance to expert clinicians.
Contribution
It investigates the medical conceptual grounding of language models and finds that pre-trained models can outperform large models in recognizing detailed medical concepts.
Findings
Pre-trained models outperform large language models in identifying specific concepts.
Language models show potential to match expert clinicians in biomedical NLP tasks.
Results highlight the importance of domain-specific training for medical language understanding.
Abstract
Language models (LMs) capabilities have grown with a fast pace over the past decade leading researchers in various disciplines, such as biomedical research, to increasingly explore the utility of LMs in their day-to-day applications. Domain specific language models have already been in use for biomedical natural language processing (NLP) applications. Recently however, the interest has grown towards medical language models and their understanding capabilities. In this paper, we investigate the medical conceptual grounding of various language models against expert clinicians for identification of hallmarks of immunotherapy in breast cancer abstracts. Our results show that pre-trained language models have potential to outperform large language models in identifying very specific (low-level) concepts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Wikis in Education and Collaboration · Topic Modeling
