A Review and Comparison of Different Sensitivity Analysis Techniques in Practice
Devin Francom, Abigael Nachtsheim

TL;DR
This paper reviews and compares various sensitivity analysis techniques, focusing on global and local methods, to guide practitioners in selecting appropriate tools based on their problem specifics and objectives.
Contribution
It provides a practical overview of widely used sensitivity analysis methods, highlighting their assumptions, constraints, and suitability for different scenarios.
Findings
Global sensitivity methods characterize input-output uncertainty relationships.
Local sensitivity methods offer insights at specific input points.
The review aids practitioners in choosing suitable sensitivity analysis approaches.
Abstract
There exist many methods for sensitivity analysis readily available to the practitioner. While each seeks to help the modeler answer the same general question -- How do sources of uncertainty or changes in the model inputs relate to uncertainty in the output? -- different methods are associated with different assumptions, constraints, and required resources, leading to conclusions that may vary in interpretability and level of detail. Thus, it is crucial that the practitioner selects the desired sensitivity analysis method judiciously, making sure to match the selected approach to the specifics of their problem and to their desired objectives. In this chapter, we provide a practical overview of a collection of widely used, widely available sensitivity analysis methods. We focus on global sensitivity approaches, which seek to characterize how uncertainty in the model output may be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
