On the intervals for the non-existence of covering systems with distinct moduli
Jack Dalton, Nic Jones

TL;DR
This paper extends previous results by proving that for every integer n ≥ 3, there is no distinct covering system with all moduli in the interval [n, 10n], improving the known bounds.
Contribution
The authors generalize prior bounds on the intervals for non-existence of covering systems, establishing the interval [n, 10n] as a limit for such systems.
Findings
No distinct covering system exists with moduli in [n, 10n] for n ≥ 3
Improves previous bounds from [n, 9n] to [n, 10n]
Builds on earlier methods to extend the non-existence interval
Abstract
In a research seminar in , M. Filaseta, O. Trifonov, and G. Yu showed for each integer there is no distinct covering with all moduli in the interval . In , this interval was subsequently improved to by the first author and O. Trifonov. The first author then improved this bound to in . Building off their method, we show that for each integer , there does not exist a distinct covering system with all moduli in the interval .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Control Systems and Analysis · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
