Origins of chalcogenide perovskite instability
Adelina Carr, Talia Glinberg, Nathan Stull, James R. Neilson, Christopher J. Bartel

TL;DR
This study investigates the stability challenges of chalcogenide perovskites, revealing that only a few compounds are both polymorphically and hull stable, and identifies key bonding interactions influencing their instability.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive DFT-based analysis of 81 ABS3 compounds, elucidating the fundamental factors behind their polymorphic and hull instability, and compares stability models with experimental data.
Findings
Only BaZrS3 and BaHfS3 are fully stable among studied compounds.
Perovskite structures are stabilized by strong B-S covalent bonds.
Weaker inductive effects in sulfides explain their scarcity compared to oxides.
Abstract
Chalcogenide perovskites, particularly II-IV ABS3 compounds, are a promising class of materials for optoelectronic applications. However, these materials frequently exhibit instability in two respects: 1) a preference for structures containing one-dimensional edge- or face-sharing octahedral networks instead of the three-dimensional corner-sharing perovskite framework (polymorphic instability), and (2) a tendency to decompose into competing compositions (hull instability). We evaluate the stability of 81 ABS3 compounds using Density Functional Theory, finding that only BaZrS3 and BaHfS3 are both polymorphically and hull stable, with the NH4CdCl3-type structure being the preferred polymorph for 77% of these compounds. Comparison with existing tolerance factor models demonstrates that these approaches work well for known perovskites but overpredict stability for compositions without…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
