Who is in the Spotlight: The Hidden Bias Undermining Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Jiayu Yao, Shenghua Liu, Yiwei Wang, Lingrui Mei, Baolong Bi, Yuyao Ge, Zhecheng Li, Xueqi Cheng

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the position of retrieved evidence affects the performance of multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems, revealing a consistent bias that impacts stability and fairness, and proposing methods to analyze and mitigate it.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of position bias in multimodal RAG systems, introducing the Position Sensitivity Index and visualization tools for bias detection.
Findings
Position bias follows a U-shaped accuracy curve.
Multimodal interactions amplify position bias.
Bias increases logarithmically with retrieval range.
Abstract
Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have become essential in knowledge-intensive and open-domain tasks. As retrieval complexity increases, ensuring the robustness of these systems is critical. However, current RAG models are highly sensitive to the order in which evidence is presented, often resulting in unstable performance and biased reasoning, particularly as the number of retrieved items or modality diversity grows. This raises a central question: How does the position of retrieved evidence affect multimodal RAG performance? To answer this, we present the first comprehensive study of position bias in multimodal RAG systems. Through controlled experiments across text-only, image-only, and mixed-modality tasks, we observe a consistent U-shaped accuracy curve with respect to evidence position. To quantify this bias, we introduce the Position Sensitivity Index…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Speech and dialogue systems · Topic Modeling
