Diverse Committees with Incomplete or Inaccurate Approval Ballots
Feline Lindeboom, Martijn Brehm, Davide Grossi, Pradeep Murukannaiah

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexity of achieving diverse approval-based committee selections under incomplete or inaccurate voter information, proposing algorithms with near-optimal query bounds and validating their performance on real and synthetic data.
Contribution
It introduces new bounds on the number of queries needed for approximate solutions and presents algorithms that nearly match these bounds under various information settings.
Findings
Adaptive algorithms require only O(m) queries, significantly fewer than non-adaptive methods.
Greedy and local search algorithms achieve near-optimal approximation ratios.
Algorithms perform well on real and synthetic data, even with practical-sized instances.
Abstract
We study diversity in approval-based committee elections with incomplete or inaccurate information. We define diversity according to the Maximum Coverage problem, which is known to be -complete, with a best attainable polynomial time approximation ratio of . In the incomplete information setting, voters vote only on a small portion of the candidates, and we prove that getting arbitrarily close to the optimal approximation ratio w.h.p. requires non-adaptive queries, where is the number of candidates. This motivates studying adaptive querying algorithms, that can adapt their querying strategy to information obtained from previous query outcomes. In that setting, we lower this bound to only queries. We propose a greedy algorithm to match this lower bound up to log-factors. We prove the same bound for the generalized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
