A note on $\mathscr{B}$-free sets and the existence of natural density
Aurelia Dymek, Stanis{\l}aw Kasjan, Joanna Ku{\l}aga-Przymus

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which sets of multiples derived from subsets of natural numbers have natural density, introducing concepts like taut and minimal sets, and demonstrating that the only obstruction to density existence is related to the associated taut set.
Contribution
The paper proves that the only obstacle to the existence of natural density in $ ext{B}$-free sets is the density of their associated taut sets, and constructs configurations where densities differ significantly.
Findings
Natural density can fail for certain $ ext{B}$-free sets.
The only obstruction to natural density is the density of the associated taut set.
Configurations with differing densities along positive upper density sets are possible.
Abstract
Given , let be the correspoding set of multiples. We say that is taut if the logarithmic density of decreases after removing any element from . We say that is minimal if it is primitive (i.e.\ for implies ) and the characteristic function of is a Toeplitz sequence (i.e.\ for every there exists such that is constant along ). With every one associates the corresponding taut set (determined uniquely among all taut sets by the condition that the associated Mirsky measures agree) and the minimal set (determined uniquely among all minimal sets by the condition that every…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
