NOCL: Node-Oriented Conceptualization LLM for Graph Tasks without Message Passing
Wei Li, Mengcheng Lan, Jiaxing Xu, Yiping Ke

TL;DR
NOCL introduces a novel language-based framework for graph tasks that converts node attributes into natural language and semantic embeddings, enabling effective zero-shot learning and broad applicability without message passing.
Contribution
The paper presents NOCL, a new LLM-based approach that extends to non-textual graphs and reduces token lengths, improving zero-shot generalization and unifying graph tasks in a language format.
Findings
Competitive supervised performance with MPNNs
Superior zero-shot generalization
Significant token length reduction (up to 93.9%)
Abstract
Graphs are essential for modeling complex interactions across domains such as social networks, biology, and recommendation systems. Traditional Graph Neural Networks, particularly Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs), rely heavily on supervised learning, limiting their generalization and applicability in label-scarce scenarios. Recent self-supervised approaches still require labeled fine-tuning, limiting their effectiveness in zero-shot scenarios. Meanwhile, Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in natural language tasks but face significant challenges when applied to graphs, including preserving reasoning abilities, managing extensive token lengths from rich node attributes, and being limited to textual-attributed graphs (TAGs) and a single level task. To overcome these limitations, we propose the Node-Oriented Conceptualization LLM (NOCL), a novel framework that leverages two core…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. The node description mechanism extends LLMs to non-text-attributed graphs such as molecular graphs, substantially broadening their applicability. It effectively unifies node-, link-, and graph-level tasks within a cohesive instruction-tuning framework. 2. Reformulating diverse graph tasks as natural-language comprehension queries is powerful, enabling unified multi-level instruction tuning under a single framework. 3. The paper provides validation across multiple datasets. NOCL not only achie
1. The paper should include comparisons with more recent baselines, such as GOFA [1], to more comprehensively demonstrate NOCL’s advantages. 2. For non-TAG datasets, the node descriptions rely on manually crafted templates. How sensitive is the model’s performance to the quality or phrasing of these templates? 3. Although the paper mentions that NOCL’s performance depends on the PLM choice, it would be helpful to show how much different PLMs affect performance and generalization. **Reference**
- This paper correctly identifies several limitations of previous methods with LLM+graph including the lack of generalization ability from GNN based models and the problem with long texts with descriptions or even neighbor descriptions. Also, it includes the non-TAG graphs that previous work overlooked. - The use of mainly LLM as a unified and generalized solution for graph-based tasks is reasonable, clean and follow the trends of LLM evolvements and potential of only LLM based graph foundation
- The node description method might not be that novel, also the way it applied to non-TAG graph might not be optimal and unified for all types of non-TAG graph. The process of having node concept as embedding produced from PLM and connector require good training of connector and high-quality PLM, the connector also might suffer alignment issue with LLM under limited training data. - There are more GNN+LLM baselines that are more up to date can be discussed and compared in this case. I think more
1) The idea of representing graph elements as language through node descriptions and “node concepts” is conceptually elegant and well-motivated, bridging structured graph representation and natural language reasoning. 2) The design is technically clean — avoiding MPNNs entirely while maintaining efficiency through compact embeddings and LoRA-based instruction tuning, which demonstrates thoughtful engineering. 3) Empirical results are convincing: NOCL matches or surpasses supervised MPNNs and pri
1) Despite the strong narrative, the methodological novelty may be seen as incremental — the key steps (description-to-embedding encoding and prompt-based task formulation) largely extend existing text-to-graph ideas without fundamentally new architecture or training objective. 2) The evaluation scope is relatively narrow: only five datasets with small graphs and simple tasks are tested, leaving open whether NOCL scales to large, complex graphs or dynamic graph settings. 3) The approach sacrific
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Graph Theory and Algorithms
