Virtualizing RAN: Science, Strategy, and Architecture of Software-Defined Mobile Networks
Ryan Barker

TL;DR
This paper presents an integrated perspective on virtualizing RAN, combining science, technology, business, and culture, with case studies, analytic bounds, and strategic recommendations for 5G and 6G networks.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive framework for RAN virtualization, including technical enablers, capacity bounds, automation strategies, and future planning for 6G evolution.
Findings
Software-defined carrier aggregation improves coverage and churn.
GPU/FPGA off-load and digital-twin automation keep latency within 0.5 ms.
vRAN cycle time can be reduced by an order of magnitude.
Abstract
Virtualizing the Radio-Access Network (RAN) is increasingly viewed as an enabler of affordable 5G expansion and a stepping-stone toward AI-native 6G. Most discussions, however, still approach spectrum policy, cloud engineering and organizational practice as separate topics. This paper offers an integrated perspective spanning four pillars -- science, technology, business strategy and culture. A comparative U.S.\ case study illustrates how mid-band contiguity, complemented by selective mmWave capacity layers, can improve both coverage and churn when orchestrated through software-defined carrier aggregation. We derive analytic capacity and latency bounds for Split 7.2 vRAN/O-RAN deployments, quantify the throughput penalty of end-to-end 256-bit encryption, and show how GPU/FPGA off-load plus digital-twin-driven automation keeps the hybrid-automatic-repeat request (HARQ)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G · Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies · Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
