Experimental observation of subabsorption
D. C. Gold, U. Saglam, S. Carpenter, A. Yadav, M. Beede, T. G. Walker, M. Saffman, and D. D. Yavuz

TL;DR
This paper reports the first experimental observation of subabsorption, a collective atomic effect where light absorption is slower than single-atom predictions, influenced by dipole-dipole correlations and highly sensitive to atomic motion.
Contribution
The study introduces and demonstrates the phenomenon of subabsorption in dilute ultracold atomic ensembles, supported by a theoretical model explaining its dependence on motional dephasing.
Findings
Subabsorption observed in ultracold rubidium atoms.
Subabsorption is highly sensitive to motional dephasing.
Theoretical model aligns with experimental data, revealing a large dephasing coefficient.
Abstract
We predict and experimentally demonstrate a new type of collective (cooperative) coupling effect where a disordered atomic ensemble absorbs light with a rise-time longer (i. e., at a rate slower) than what is dictated by single-atom physics. This effect, which we name subabsorption, can be viewed as the absorptive analog of subradiance. The experiment is performed using a dilute ensemble of ultracold Rb atoms with a low optical depth, and time-resolving the absorption of a weak (tens of photons per pulse) resonant laser beam. In this dilute regime, the collective interaction relies on establishing dipole-dipole correlations over many atoms; i.e., the interaction is not dominated by the nearest neighbors. As a result, subabsorption is highly susceptible to motional dephasing: even a temperature increase of 60 K is enough to completely extinguish the subabsorption signal. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
