Down But Not Out: The Case of Long-Period Comet C/2021 O3 (Panstarrs)
David Jewitt. Jing Li, Michael Jaeger, Yoonyoung Kim

TL;DR
This study combines ground and space observations to analyze long-period comet C/2021 O3, revealing it survived perihelion without nucleus destruction, with insights into its activity, debris, and nucleus properties.
Contribution
It provides new observational evidence that the comet's nucleus survived perihelion, challenging expectations of destruction, and offers detailed analysis of its activity and debris characteristics.
Findings
Nucleus survived perihelion without destruction.
Pre-perihelion activity showed a smaller heliocentric dependence than typical.
Nucleus radius estimated between 1.0 and 1.7 km.
Abstract
We combine ground- and space-based observations of long-period comet C/2021 O3 (Panstarrs) (perihelion distance 0.287 au) in order to investigate its reported near-perihelion destruction. Pre-perihelion photometric observations show a remarkably small heliocentric dependence of the scattered light, with , distinct from values reported in other long-period comets, for which = 4 is the canonical standard. The index is smaller than expected of coma production by equilibrium sublimation of either supervolatiles (for which 4 is expected), or water ice ( 6 to 8) across the 4 au to 2 au range. The absolute magnitude deduced from the pre-perihelion data is = 13.00.3 (coma scattering cross-section 225 km for an assumed geometric albedo 0.04) while, after perihelion, the cross-section fades by a factor of 25 to …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Planetary Science and Exploration · Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
