Understanding Human-AI Trust in Education
Griffin Pitts, Sanaz Motamedi

TL;DR
This study investigates how human-like and system-like trust influence students' perceptions of AI chatbots in education, revealing distinct effects and emphasizing the need for new trust models for human-AI interactions.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of human-like and system-like trust in educational AI chatbots, highlighting their differential impacts on student perceptions and proposing the concept of human-AI trust.
Findings
Human-like trust strongly predicts trusting intention.
System-like trust more influences behavioral intention and perceived usefulness.
Both trust types similarly affect perceived enjoyment.
Abstract
As AI chatbots become integrated in education, students are turning to these systems for guidance, feedback, and information. However, the anthropomorphic characteristics of these chatbots create ambiguity over whether students develop trust in them in ways similar to trusting a human peer or instructor (human-like trust, often linked to interpersonal trust models) or in ways similar to trusting a conventional technology (system-like trust, often linked to technology trust models). This ambiguity presents theoretical challenges, as interpersonal trust models may inappropriately ascribe human intentionality and morality to AI, while technology trust models were developed for non-social systems, leaving their applicability to conversational, human-like agents unclear. To address this gap, we examine how these two forms of trust, human-like and system-like, comparatively influence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
