Testing Shape Restrictions with Continuous Treatment: A Transformation Model Approach
Arkadiusz Szyd{\l}owski

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new statistical testing method for shape restrictions like convexity or concavity in transformation models, useful for verifying treatment effects without estimating transformations or error distributions.
Contribution
It develops a bootstrap-based testing procedure for shape restrictions in semiparametric models that does not require estimating the transformation or error distribution.
Findings
The tests effectively verify convexity or concavity in empirical data.
Bootstrap critical values provide accurate inference.
Application demonstrates testing of loan demand convexity.
Abstract
We propose tests for the convexity/linearity/concavity of a transformation of the dependent variable in a semiparametric transformation model. These tests can be used to verify monotonicity of the treatment effect, or, equivalently, concavity/convexity of the outcome with respect to the treatment, in (quasi-)experimental settings. Our procedure does not require estimation of the transformation or the distribution of the error terms. The statistic takes the form of a U statistic or a localised U statistic, and we show that critical values can be obtained by bootstrapping. In our application we test the convexity of loan demand with respect to the interest rate using experimental data from South Africa.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference · Firm Innovation and Growth
