Krylov Complexity in Lifshitz-type Dirac Field Theories
Hamid R. Imani, Komeil Babaei Velni, M. Reza Mohammadi Mozaffar

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Krylov complexity behaves in Lifshitz-type Dirac theories, revealing the effects of UV cutoffs, lattice discretization, and the Lifshitz exponent on operator growth and information spreading.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of Krylov complexity in Lifshitz scaling theories, including continuum and lattice models, highlighting the influence of UV cutoffs and the Lifshitz exponent.
Findings
Krylov complexity shows initial exponential growth then linear saturation in continuum models.
Lattice models cause Krylov complexity to saturate due to finite basis size.
Increasing the Lifshitz exponent $z$ suppresses complexity and entropy in continuum models, but enhances them under UV cutoff.
Abstract
We study Krylov complexity in Lifshitz-type Dirac field theories with a generic dynamical critical exponent . By computing the Lanczos coefficients for massless and massive cases, we analyze the growth and saturation behavior of Krylov complexity in different regimes. We incorporate a hard UV cutoff and investigate the effects of lattice discretization, revealing fundamental differences between continuum and lattice models. In the presence of a UV cutoff, Krylov complexity exhibits an initial exponential growth followed by a linear regime, with saturation values of the Lanczos coefficients dictated by the cutoff scale. For the lattice model, we find a fundamental departure from the continuum case: due to the finite Krylov basis, Krylov complexity saturates rather than growing indefinitely. Our findings suggest that Lifshitz scaling influences operator growth and information spreading…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
