Price Discovery in Cryptocurrency Markets

TL;DR

This paper investigates how price discovery occurs across centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency markets, analyzing Ethereum and Bitcoin to understand lead-lag relationships, cointegration, and market efficiency.

Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive framework combining theoretical and empirical tools to compare price discovery in centralized exchanges, decentralized AMMs, and futures markets for ETH and BTC.

Findings

Centralized markets generally lead in ETH price discovery.

Futures markets tend to lead, but high volatility causes mixed results.

Decentralized AMMs show different dynamics compared to centralized exchanges.

Abstract

This document analyzes price discovery in cryptocurrency markets by comparing centralized and decentralized exchanges, as well as spot and futures markets. The study focuses first on Ethereum (ETH) and then applies a similar approach to Bitcoin (BTC). Chapter 1 outlines the theoretical framework, emphasizing the structural differences between centralized exchanges and decentralized finance mechanisms, especially Automated Market Makers (AMMs). It also explains how to construct an order book from a liquidity pool in a decentralized setting for comparison with centralized exchanges. Chapter 2 describes the methodological tools used: Hasbrouck's Information Share, Gonzalo and Granger's Permanent-Transitory decomposition, and the Hayashi-Yoshida estimator. These are applied to explore lead-lag dynamics, cointegration, and price discovery across market types. Chapter 3 presents the empirical analysis. For ETH, it compares price dynamics on Binance and Uniswap v2 over a one-year period, focusing on five key events in 2024. For BTC, it analyzes the relationship between spot and futures prices on the CME. The study estimates lead-lag effects and cointegration in both cases. Results show that centralized markets typically lead in ETH price discovery. In futures markets, while they tend to lead overall, high-volatility periods produce mixed outcomes. The findings have key implications for traders and institutions regarding liquidity, arbitrage, and market efficiency. Various metrics are used to benchmark the performance of modified AMMs and to understand the interaction between decentralized and centralized structures.