Towards Fair Representation: Clustering and Consensus

TL;DR

This paper introduces the first constant-factor approximation algorithms for fair consensus clustering, addressing the challenge of creating representative and equitable clusterings based on protected attributes.

Contribution

It presents novel algorithms for fair consensus clustering, including optimal solutions for equal group representation and approximation algorithms for unequal groups, along with NP-hardness results.

Findings

First to provide approximation algorithms for fair consensus clustering.

Developed an optimal algorithm for datasets with equal group representation.

Proved NP-hardness for the problem with unequal group sizes.

Abstract

Consensus clustering, a fundamental task in machine learning and data analysis, aims to aggregate multiple input clusterings of a dataset, potentially based on different non-sensitive attributes, into a single clustering that best represents the collective structure of the data. In this work, we study this fundamental problem through the lens of fair clustering, as introduced by Chierichetti et al. [NeurIPS'17], which incorporates the disparate impact doctrine to ensure proportional representation of each protected group in the dataset within every cluster. Our objective is to find a consensus clustering that is not only representative but also fair with respect to specific protected attributes. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to address this problem and provide a constant-factor approximation. As part of our investigation, we examine how to minimally modify an existing clustering to enforce fairness -- an essential postprocessing step in many clustering applications that require fair representation. We develop an optimal algorithm for datasets with equal group representation and near-linear time constant factor approximation algorithms for more general scenarios with different proportions of two group sizes. We complement our approximation result by showing that the problem is NP-hard for two unequal-sized groups. Given the fundamental nature of this problem, we believe our results on Closest Fair Clustering could have broader implications for other clustering problems, particularly those for which no prior approximation guarantees exist for their fair variants.