Large eddy simulations of conjugate heat transfer in boundary layers over laser-scanned ice roughness
Federico Zabaleta, Brett Bornhoft, Suhas S. Jain, Sanjeeb T. Bose, Parviz Moin

TL;DR
This study uses wall-modeled large-eddy simulations with conjugate heat transfer to accurately model heat flux and temperature distributions over ice roughness, revealing significant effects of roughness on heat transfer that are missed by traditional models.
Contribution
It introduces a conjugate heat transfer simulation approach with WMLES for ice roughness, improving accuracy in heat transfer predictions over traditional empirical models.
Findings
WMLES with CHT accurately captures surface temperature and heat flux distributions.
Large roughness ratios disrupt outer-layer similarity, causing errors in empirical roughness models.
Heat flux at roughness crests decreases with increasing roughness height, sometimes reversing direction.
Abstract
Accurate modeling of ice accretion is important for safe and efficient design of aircraft and wind turbine systems. Heat transfer predictions obtained from fluid flow solvers are used as input in ice accretion codes. In glaze ice conditions, freezing rates and resulting ice shapes are highly sensitive to input values of the heat transfer coefficient. Hence, accurate prediction of heat transfer on iced airfoils is crucial for correctly predicting the ice accretion process. In this study, we perform conjugate heat transfer (CHT) simulations using wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) over surfaces characterized by ice roughness. The results show that WMLES with CHT accurately captures surface temperature distributions and heat fluxes across a range of roughness geometries. For cases considered, large roughness-to-boundary-layer thickness ratios disrupt outer-layer similarity, leading…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
